Home » Traceability » The Limitations, Drawbacks, and Risks of Using Legacy Requirements Management Tools
×

You're moments away from product development success!

First Name
Last Name
Company
Industry
Country
State
Province
Pending Opt-In
All fields are required. Your privacy is important to us.
Thank you!
Error - something went wrong!
   

The Limitations, Drawbacks, and Risks of Using Legacy Requirements Management Tools

Requirements management (RM) tools started to evolve more than 25 years ago when it became clear that document-based tools such as Microsoft Office did not offer capabilities able to manage and analyze requirements traceability. Early requirements tools included QSS DOORS® (now IBM), Rational Requisite Pro (end of life), Borland Calibre RM (now Microfocus), and a couple of others. Legacy requirements solutions may have handled managing requirements in the past, but are failing to keep pace over time due to increasing engineering complexity and the need for modern software to be far easier to use.  

In this eBook, we will explore topics relevant to legacy requirements management tools, including:  

  • Why organizations elect to move away from legacy tools  

  • What benefits are realized after making the switch 

  • How to successfully migrate 

 

Previous Video
Requirements Traceability Benchmark
Requirements Traceability Benchmark

Learn about Live Traceability™ and the 1st ever Requirements Traceability Benchmark study analyzing over 40...

Next Flipbook
Axendia Report: The Costly Impact of Ineffective Requirements Management
Axendia Report: The Costly Impact of Ineffective Requirements Management

In this medical device research study from Axendia, a leading Life-Sciences Analyst firm, see how ineffecti...

×

First Name
Last Name
Company
Industry
Country
State
Province
Pending Opt-In
All fields are required. Your privacy is important to us.
Thank you!
Error - something went wrong!
Return to Home